One of the hardest decisions a research institution makes is what not to study. Every week we hear of problems that deserve attention. Our capacity is limited, and a half finished study helps no one. So we use a few simple tests.
Does someone need the answer? We prefer questions that a decision maker, an institution or a community is actually facing, where better evidence could change what they do.
Can we add something? If good research already exists, our job may be to bring it to the right people rather than to repeat it. We look for gaps.
Can we do it well? We ask whether we have, or can bring in, the skills and access the question requires.
Is the timing right? Some questions are urgent because a decision is about to be made. Others are slow and structural. We try to keep a balance between the two.
Will it be heard? A study that no one will read is a poor use of time. We think about who the audience is from the start.
Questions that pass these tests go to the relevant research vertical, which keeps a short list of priorities published on its page.
We welcome suggestions. Some of our best projects began with a message from a reader, an official or a student. If you have a question you think we should be asking, tell us.
[Placeholder publication.]