CRGD: The Public Policy Bridge logoCentre for Research on Governance and DevelopmentThe Public Policy Bridge

Independent Research. Informed Dialogue. Transformative Policy.

Latest Updates

Policy BriefGovernance, Finance and Accountability

Bringing Off Budget Borrowing into the Light

Borrowing by state owned bodies has become a large and contested part of public finance. A simple annual disclosure statement would let legislators and citizens see the full picture without stopping investment.

Placeholder policy brief. This text and any images are samples that show how the page will look. Replace them in the CMS, then switch off the "Placeholder" tick box on this entry.
Policy Brief
Contents
  1. The problem
  2. What we found
  3. Recommendations
  4. Why this matters

The problem

Indian states increasingly finance roads, bridges, hospitals and other public assets through borrowing by special purpose bodies and public sector undertakings, rather than directly through the state budget. This has allowed investment that the state could not otherwise afford within its borrowing limits. It has also made it harder for legislators, auditors and citizens to see the total obligations that the state has taken on, and how they will be repaid.

The question has become politically charged, with disputes between the Union and states over whether such borrowing should count against state borrowing limits. Lost in the dispute is a simpler point on which all sides should agree: whatever the accounting rule, the public deserves to know the numbers.

What we found

Our review of state budget documents found that:

  • information on borrowing by state bodies is spread across several documents, in different formats and at different dates
  • repayment obligations that will fall on the state budget in future years are rarely set out in one place
  • guarantees given by the state to lenders are disclosed, but their likely cost is not estimated
  • legislators receive little time or analytical support to examine these figures

Recommendations

  1. Publish an annual Statement of Extended Public Liabilities alongside the budget, listing borrowing by every state owned body that is serviced wholly or partly from the budget, with the repayment schedule for the next ten years.
  2. Estimate the expected cost of guarantees, not only their face value, using a published method.
  3. Refer the statement to the Committee on Estimates or a new fiscal committee of the legislature for examination each year.
  4. Ask the state’s auditor to certify the statement within six months of the end of the financial year.

Why this matters

Transparency does not settle the argument about how much a state should borrow. It makes that argument possible on the basis of shared facts. A state that discloses its full obligations will find it easier to defend its borrowing to lenders, to the Union and to its own citizens.

[Placeholder publication. This sample shows the structure of a policy brief. Replace with real CRGD work.]

About the author

Scholar One

Senior Scholar, Governance and Federalism

[Placeholder] Two sentences on this scholar's research, publications and the verticals they lead at CRGD.

Stay informed

Subscribe to email updates

One email a fortnight with our newest research, upcoming events and calls for applications. No spam, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

CRGD: The Public Policy Bridge

Support CRGD: The Public Policy Bridge

Independent research depends on people who value it. Your contribution funds fellowships, field work and free public events, and it never buys a conclusion.

Ways to support